On today’s Bearing Arms’ Cam & Company, Gun Owners Action League executive director Jim Wallace said that in the state of Massachusetts, the process is the punishment for legal gun owners caught up in the web of draconian gun control laws and overly broad discretion for gun owners. Wallace was referring to a couple of cases involving some egregiously awful license to carry suspensions, but the case of Scott LaPanne may be an even better example of what Wallace was referring to.
In February 2024, LaPanne was arrested on nearly two dozen possessory offenses and was looking at the potential of a 300-year sentence after being charged. As Attorney General Andrea Campbell boasted in a press release after his arrest:
Homeland Security Investigations’ New England Cyber Crimes Group initiated an investigation into possible firearm parts purchased online by LaPanne. He then became the target of an investigation, led by the Attorney General’s Office, HSI New England Cyber Crimes Group, Customs and Border Patrol, and United States Postal Inspection Service, into the unlawful possession of firearms and his suitability to hold a Massachusetts Firearms License to Carry. The investigation revealed that since 2019, LaPanne purchased approximately 50 firearms-related items.
There was no allegation that LaPanne was selling any of those items without an FFL. And the “arsenal” of firearms seized when the police invaded his home would only cause alarm to the most ardent anti-gunners.
7 AR-15 style rifles, 1 AK-47 rifle, 1 .22 bolt action rifle, 3 shotguns, 1 .303 bolt action rifle, 8 handguns, 23 large capacity magazines capable of holding more than 10 rounds of ammunition, 2 silencers, and hundreds of rounds of various caliber ammunition.
Despite the fact that LaPanne wasn’t charged with any kind of trafficking offense, much less accused of a violent crime, he was held behind bars without bail because of his supposed “dangerousness.” Even when LaPanne was released from custody, he was required to wear an electronic monitoring device and was essentially confined to his home.
Now, about 2 1/2 years after LaPanne’s initial arrest, he is finally a free man. The Massachusetts Attorney General’s office has dismissed all of the charges against LaPanne, and his attorney Patrick K. Daubert says the state’s case fell apart because that police search of his home was illegal.
That search is where the case turned. On the very morning it happened, a prosecutor who reviewed the application had already concluded there was no probable cause. Investigators nonetheless arrested Mr. LaPanne away from his home on an unrelated traffic matter, followed his longtime partner back to the house, and — after she refused them entry more than once and told them to return with a warrant — walked in anyway.
A judge of the Barnstable Superior Court saw it for what it was. In a detailed written decision, the court found there had been no voluntary consent to the entry — only “acquiescence to a claim of lawful authority.” The court declined to credit the officers’ account of events as “implausible,” and described the suggestion that a signed warrant was already in hand as a “blatant misrepresentation.” The court suppressed everything obtained through the unlawful entry.
Once the fruits of that entry were gone, the Commonwealth’s case went with them. In August 2026 the Commonwealth through the office of the Attorney General dismissed every charge — all 23 indictments — acknowledging in its own filing that, without the suppressed evidence, it could not meet its burden of proof. Scott LaPanne walked away a free man, fully vindicated, with no conviction of any kind.
Despite the fact that LaPanne is no longer facing charges, he’s still been punished for a crime without ever being convicted. As Daubert writes:
The cost to the LaPanne family cannot be measured in motions and hearings. For nearly 900 days of GPS-monitored home confinment, a man who could not leave his own home also could not work or provide for his family, and a household built for two ran on one. The ordinary rhythms of raising two children — the school events, the games, the hundred small tasks two parents share — fell to the parent left to carry them. None of it grew out of anything Mr. LaPanne had done. All of it grew out of a search a court would later hold unconstitutional.
This is what Wallace means by the process is the punishment. It wasn’t just LaPanne’s life that was turned upside down. His wife and kids suffered as well. The financial burdens created by the state are significant too, and LaPanne has no real chance of seeing any of those legal fees or lost wages returned to him unless he can mount a civil suit arguing that his rights were violated when the illegal search was conducted.
The items that LaPanne owned are perfectly legal in the vast majority of the country, but in Massachusetts simply possessing these items can result in time behind bars… even if your case never goes to trial.
I can’t imagine the relief that LaPanne and his family must be feeling today, but though his legal nightmare is over, the damage done to him and his family is real and severe. I hope that LaPanne has made plans to leave Massachusetts and settle down in a state that respects our right to keep and bear arms, because it wouldn’t surprise me one bit if Campbell and local law enforcement try to go after him again in the future. Scott LaPanne may not have an electronic monitoring device on his ankle anymore, but I suspect he still has a target on his back.
Editor’s Note: The radical Left will stop at nothing to enact their radical gun control agenda and strip us of our Second Amendment rights.
Help us continue to report on and expose the Democrats’ gun control policies and schemes. Join Bearing Arms VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.
Read the full article here
