HomeGunsMaryland's Red Flag Law Challenged in State Supreme Court

Maryland’s Red Flag Law Challenged in State Supreme Court

Published on

Weekly Newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

Attorneys for the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Maryland resident Donald S. Willey have filed an appellants’ brief with the Maryland Supreme Court, challenging the state’s “red flag” law. The case, Willey v. Brown, originated in U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in August 2023.

Willey, a 64-year-old Marine Corps veteran, has been in conflict with officials in Dorchester County over nuisance and zoning violations. He became the subject of an Extreme Risk Protective Order (ERPO) after allegedly making threats, which Willey denies. The order led to the confiscation of his firearms and ammunition and forced him into an involuntary mental health evaluation. The lawsuit claims Willey’s constitutional rights were violated for nearly two weeks before his firearms were returned.

While the federal lawsuit is still pending, it depends on how Maryland law defines “reasonable grounds” in the state’s ERPO law. The U.S. District Court has asked the Maryland Supreme Court to interpret the term before the federal case continues. The court is being asked to clarify two legal questions: What legal standard does “reasonable grounds” imply in Maryland’s red flag law, and can an ERPO be issued based on a standard less than probable cause?

“This case is about how so-called ‘red flag laws’ can be weaponized against private citizens,” said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb. “We’re asking the Maryland high court to define the meaning of ‘reasonable grounds’ in the state ERPO statute to help make our case in federal court.”

SAF Executive Director Adam Kraut echoed the concerns about the law’s implications. “Red flag laws are based on the Orwellian belief that you can take actions against someone for an alleged crime that hasn’t occurred,” Kraut said. “The concept is absurd.”

The case will proceed in federal court once the Maryland Supreme Court issues its decision.

Willey and SAF are represented by attorneys Mark W. Pennak of Maryland Shall Issue, as well as Edward A. Paltzik, Serge Krimnus and Meredith Lloyd of Bochner PLLC in New York.

Read the full article here

Latest articles

Where Did The Myth Of Overpopulation Come From?

This article was originally published by Rhoda Wilson at The Daily Exposé. Population alarmists who...

50+ Soup Canning Recipes for a Rainy Day

There’s nothing like the convenience of home-canned soup when you need a quick, wholesome...

Saving ‘Souls of Communities’: TGR Highlights Power of Indy Pass in New Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTj2F7YDHUs As huge corporations like Vail Resorts and Alterra Mountain Company grow and acquire new...

Active Recovery With KEEN: Nolan John’s Weekend in Austin

When ultra runner and sobriety enthusiast Nolan John isn’t racking up miles in the...

Walz’s Gun Handling Elicits Howls of Ridicule From Across the Internet

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz has done everything he can to position himself as a...

More like this

Beyond 5.56: Top Chamberings for MSRs

Modern sporting rifles, particularly the AR-15 and AR-10 platforms, have...

Ukraine Is Losing: “Elite” Troops Surrender To Russia In Kursk Region

The Ukrainian military is being outdone by Russia and it looks like its defeat...

Improve Aero in Real Time: ‘Body Rocket’ Measures Drag on Your Bike

At the cutting edge of cycling, most athletes don’t have access to arguably the...

Young Gun Control Advocate Falsely Claims Gun Violence “The Worst It’s Ever Been”

Utah has one of the lowest homicide rates in the country, so I was...

Algae-Core Skis Are Full of Surprises: WNDR Nocturne 88 Review

By ignoring obvious warning signs, I found myself staring down 3,000 vertical feet of...

Media Acknowledges Washington State Gun Laws Not Working

Gun control advocates repeatedly argue that if you restrict guns, criminals won't be able...