Dr. John Lott is stirring the pot again and this time it’s over who’s actually committing mass attacks in America.
In a new op-ed, Lott takes aim at what he calls a “filtered narrative” around terrorism and mass shootings in the U.S., arguing that the data doesn’t match what Americans are constantly told.
According to Lott, the dominant message from politicians and media has been clear: white supremacists are the primary domestic threat. But he says a deeper look at long-term data tells a more complicated story.
What the Numbers Say
Lott breaks down mass public shootings from 1998 through 2025 and highlights a few key points:
- 108 mass public shootings, involving 111 shooters
- 8 of those shooters were Muslim (7.2%)
- Muslims make up roughly 0.4% of the U.S. population
That’s where his argument hits hardest. He claims that’s about 18 times higher than their share of the population.
On the flip side, Lott notes that:
- White males commit mass shootings below their share of the population
- Only about 6.5% of attackers expressed white supremacist or similar views
He also points out that many shooters don’t fit clean ideological boxes at all, despite how they’re often labeled after the fact.
A big chunk of Lott’s argument isn’t just about the numbers. It’s about how those numbers are presented.
He calls out what he sees as selective labeling, arguing that attackers with left-leaning or mixed motivations often get lumped into broader categories like “right-wing extremism,” while others are excluded from those counts entirely.
That, according to Lott, creates a skewed perception of risk and ultimately shapes policy in ways that may not match reality.
The Bigger Point
The Terror Threat We Aren’t Supposed To Discuss
The evidence showed Muslims in the US commit terrorism at a greatly disproportionate rate. The data also contradict claims that whites or right-wing white supremacists pose the primary terrorist threat.https://t.co/jF7KwPPZNF
— John R Lott Jr. (@JohnRLottJr) March 17, 2026
To be clear, Lott does acknowledge that most Muslims are not a threat and that terrorism comes in many forms. But his core argument is simple:
If policymakers want real solutions, they need to start with accurate data, not political narratives.
And that’s where this gets controversial. Because once you start digging into who’s committing what (and why), it forces a conversation a lot of people would rather avoid.
What Do You Think?
Is Lott exposing something real here or just cherry-picking stats to make a point?
Are we getting the full picture on threats in America… or just the version that fits the narrative?
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***
Read the full article here
