HomeUSAWays and Means Republicans Wouldn't Remove Suppressors from NFA List, But Did...

Ways and Means Republicans Wouldn’t Remove Suppressors from NFA List, But Did Do This?

Published on

Weekly Newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

To say I’m still miffed about what happened with the Hearing Protection Act is putting it too mildly. We have a golden opportunity here where the measure can be tacked onto the budget bill, which cannot be filibustered, and will stop anti-gunners in Congress from doing anything.

Instead, we get an elimination in the cost of a tax stamp for a suppressor, but not for other NFA items, and not for deregulating suppressors.

But let’s focus on the tax stamp for NFA items for a second. That seems like a small thing to do. If you’re willing to do it for suppressors, why not for short-barreled rifles and machine guns? The cost of machine guns is high enough as it is, for crying out loud, so a $200 tax stamp is nothing.

The reason given was that they couldn’t make it happen this year.

But Gun Owners of America is calling male bovine feces on that one.

Now, let’s understand that tanning salons use tanning beds that increase the risk of skin cancer. These are not healthy in any way, shape, or form. My father-in-law, a former competitive bodybuilder who spent a lot of time in tanning beds for his competitions, has been one of the millions who have had to be treated for skin cancer because of them.

NFA items aren’t anything of the sort. They don’t cause inadvertent health issues. 

Moreover, they’re part of our right to keep and bear arms. Yet we’re taxed just to ask if we can exercise that part of our rights, but an entire industry with significant health ramifications can see the federal excise tax removed?

Look, don’t get me wrong. I actually don’t care if tanning salons aren’t taxed anymore. Since I’m generally anti-tax as a matter of course, this isn’t an issue for me in and of itself.

My issue is that the supposedly pro-gun Republican Party that gutted two important pro-gun bills that sought to nerf the National Firearms Act were soundly dismissed, and even removing the cost for tax stamps across the board was a non-starter, but they can do something like this.

About a month ago, I said it was important that we make Republicans afraid for their jobs if they didn’t step up and support the Second Amendment through more than just words.

Right now, they know we’re not going to vote Democrat, and they’re confident we can’t rally support around any opposition in the primaries. That means they figure they can take a dump on us anytime they want, and we just have to take it.

Someone got something from a tanning industry lobbyist, slipped this in, and since it’s pretty innocuous, no one said anything until GOA posted this on X.

But now we know. Now we know, and I’m more than miffed now.

Remember this come the midterms.



Read the full article here

Latest articles

More Power, Fake Shifts, Improved Range: 2026 Lexus RZ Reveal

The 2026 Lexus RZ is getting more range and more horsepower. A new F...

Article Claims Gun Storage Saves Lives, But Let’s Clarify a Few Things

I'm a proponent of proper firearm...

No Human Bird Flu Cases In 3 Months; Scientists Ask Why

An officially reported bird flu case in a human being has not been reported...

From Fire to Ice: Solo Stove Launches Cooler That Blasts A/C

The first-ever cooler from Solo Stove aims for more than keeping your food fresh....

More like this

Springfield Armory Launches Model 2020 Heatseeker

GENESEO, ILL. (05/20/25) – Springfield Armory® is proud to announce...

Case Knife Celebrates Appalachian Trail Conservancy’s 100th Anniversary

This Case x ATC 100th-anniversary collab showcases the iconic AT diamond symbol and the...