HomeGunsCourt Rules California Must Issue Nonresident Carry Permits

Court Rules California Must Issue Nonresident Carry Permits

Published on

Weekly Newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

A U.S. District Court for the Central District of California has issued a preliminary injunction requiring California to accept concealed carry permit applications from nonresidents. The decision marks a notable breakthrough in the neverending legal battles over the state’s restrictive concealed carry and other antigun policies.

The case, CRPA v. LASD, was spearheaded by the California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA) in partnership with the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), Gun Owners of California, Gun Owners of America (GOA) and individual plaintiffs. The ruling stems from a challenge to California’s refusal to issue permits to nonresidents and its excessive wait times and fees in Los Angeles County.

Strengthening the Right to Self-Defense

“This ruling reaffirms the principle that the right to self-defense doesn’t stop at state borders,” said Chuck Michel, CRPA president and general counsel. “California’s discriminatory refusal to issue permits to nonresidents was a clear violation of the Second Amendment, and we’re proud to stand alongside SAF and other partners to challenge it.”

The court’s injunction mandates California to accept carry permit applications from any U.S. resident who is a member of SAF, CRPA or affiliated organizations, provided they are not otherwise prohibited from firearm ownership. The order, issued on Jan. 23, will take effect in 90 days, which provides the State of California plenty of time to appeal the limited ruling.

“The judge ruled that as a SAF member, your right to carry a firearm for self-defense doesn’t stop at the California border just because you are a resident of another state. This is just one more benefit of being a SAF member,” says Alan Gottlieb, SAF founder and executive vice president.

SAF Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack emphasized the broader implications.

“It’s common sense that your fundamental right to bear arms does not evaporate when you leave your home state. We’re committed to dragging states like California kicking and screaming into alignment with the demands of the Constitution,” Sack says.

A Milestone for the Pro-Gun Community

The lawsuit, filed in December 2023 with a motion for preliminary injunction in January 2024, underscores the value of multiple gun rights organizations working together to protect and expand Second Amendment rights. It also signifies the growing strength of the pro-Second Amendment community in combating unconstitutional restrictions nationwide.

“This is a step forward for restoring and protecting the right to bear arms in California,” Michel added. “The CRPA has long fought against California’s unconstitutional restrictions, and this decision ensures that peaceable gun owners from other states can now exercise their Second Amendment rights while in California.”

Read the full article here

Latest articles

More like this

Go-Kart Mode Engaged: 2025 MINI Cooper S Hardtop 2-Door Review

When I picked up the 2025 MINI Cooper S Hardtop 2-Door, I knew it’d...

The Federalist Makes the Case for National Reciprocity

The only reason I wouldn't vote...

Shoot Indoors With CoolFire’s Sidekick for AR15s

CoolFire Trainer is a company in Tulsa, Oklahoma that makes products that...

Memphis Armed Robber Hospitalized After Victim Fights Back

A Memphis man is in the...

Dark 30 Defiance 640 PTZ: Roof Mounted Thermal

Rugged, Compact, and Ready for Action The Dark 30 Defiance 640 PTZ...