HomeTactical & SurvivalWhite House Legalizes All Gain-Of-Function Research to Build More BIOWEAPONS

White House Legalizes All Gain-Of-Function Research to Build More BIOWEAPONS

Published on

Weekly Newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

This article was originally published by Ethan Huff at Natural News. 

The regime of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris has revealed that formerly illegal gain-of-function research is now fully legal, meaning the bioweapons industry is free to start churning out more plagues like the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

Entitled “United States Government Policy for Oversight of Dual Use Research of Concern and Pathogens with Enhanced Pandemic Potential,” a new White House document explains how “certain types of federally funded life sciences research on biological agents and toxins” is now legal, including the kind of biological agents and toxins that “when enhanced, have the potential to pose risks to public health, agriculture, food security, economic security, or national security.”

The new rules are to replace those established in 2012 and 2014, which at that time did not allow for gain-of-function research to take place on United States soil – back then, gain-of-function was only supposed to take place in China, Ukraine, or elsewhere.

Part of the new plan is to have the appropriate federal agencies complete “an interagency review” of the situation in order to “strengthen responsible conduct for biological research” moving forward.

“This Policy has also been issued pursuant to Section 2315 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (42 U.S.C. § 6627) to achieve consistent review and oversight of life sciences research proposed for federal funding that may be reasonably anticipated to involve the creation, transfer, or use of pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential (PEPPs),” reads the “Purpose” section of the new rules.

(Related: Earlier this year, it came out that both Google and YouTube helped fund the development of the Wuhan coronavirus [COVID-19] bioweapon.)

Will there be more COVID-like bioweapons in 2025?

Starting in early 2025, the federal government will need to make any necessary updates to its guidance concerning this area of research so it reflects the changes. Research involving biological agents and toxins “is essential to the scientific advances that underpin improvements in the health and safety of the public, agricultural crops and other plants, animals, and the environment,” the document states.

“The intent of research oversight is to increase the awareness of researchers, research institutions, and federal funding agencies about the biosafety and biosecurity concerns associated with certain types of research to ensure that appropriate risk mitigation measures are in place to prevent biosafety incidents (e.g., unintended personal exposure or release of an agent outside of containment) or biosecurity incidents (e.g., theft or intentional misuse of information, knowledge, products, or technology).”

Everything laid out in the White House document makes gain-of-function research sound important and essential to both the well-being and perpetuity of humanity itself. We know, however, from what happened with COVID-19 that tampering with disease is a recipe for disaster.

The University of Nebraska Medical Center published a notice about the changes that make it sound as if the White House is “tightening” the research rules for gain-of-function rather than expanding them.

“The White House is tightening federal oversight of so-called gain-of-function (GOF) studies that could enhance risky viruses in ways that increase their ability to cause a pandemic,” the Center says. “It is also overhauling rules for a broader category of federally funded research on dangerous pathogens that is considered ‘dual use,’ because the results could be used as bioweapons.”

According to the Center, the new rules, released by the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), “are narrower” than the ones floated last year. Scientists feared that the initial rules would “complicate studies on low-risk pathogens such as cold viruses and herpesviruses,” so they were replaced with new rules that “will expand the number of studies that must undergo special review” as part of the gain-of-function bioweapons development process.

Read the full article here

Latest articles

Pro-Gun Candidates Sweep 2024 Elections!

In a decisive election night, pro-gun candidates swept major races,...

Florida Voters Enshrine Right to Hunt and Fish in State Constitution

Florida's highly publicized referendums on abortion...

Legal Group Files Complaint Against UK Nonprofit For Interfering in American Election

This article was originally published by Cassie B. at Natual News.  A legal group has...

Philly Doctor’s Plan to Tackle Gun Violence? Infringing On Your Rights

Trauma surgeons play an important role...

Obscure Object of Desire – S&W Regulation Police .32 S&W Long

The evolution of American police arms is an interesting one....

More like this

Gun Rights Groups Celebrating Trump Win, And We Are Too!

Donald Trump is heading to the...

Why Kamala Harris Lost – The Truth About Guns

I fell asleep last night watching election coverage and praying...

Ukraine “Fears” Trump Will Not Support Its War With Russia

The ruler-elect, Donald Trump, has vowed to remove financial and military backing for Ukraine....

Airline-Friendly, Lightweight Avi Pack: Scott Patrol E2 30 Review

A few seconds after my ski partner and I dropped into a steep north-facing...

Blue State Anti-Gun Activists Mobilize to Enact ‘Red Flag’ Law

After the shootings in Lewiston, Maine...

Hunters, Anglers Win Election Fights in Colorado and Florida

Hunting has been in the crosshairs of several groups in recent years, but this...