Here’s a wild question: In a world of drone swarms, AI-guided submarines, and robotic fighter jets—does your concealed carry piece even matter anymore?

That’s not a knock on the Second Amendment. It’s a wake-up call.

If you caught the recent 60 Minutes piece on Palmer Luckey’s autonomous weapons company Anduril, you probably saw the future—jets with no pilots, subs with no crews, drones that think for themselves and strike with terrifying precision. They don’t need permission, and they don’t miss.

So what happens to private gun ownership when machines can target, track, and eliminate threats faster than any human ever could?

The End of the Armed Citizen?

Let’s be real. Concealed carry has always been about leveling the playing field. The government can’t be everywhere, and criminals don’t follow laws. So we arm ourselves—not out of paranoia, but out of realism.

But what happens when the government is everywhere—floating overhead, scanning heat signatures, and armed with unmanned weapons that need no human pilot to pull the trigger?

At what point does the armed citizen become obsolete?

And maybe more importantly: At what point does the armed citizen become the target?

Peace Through Precision—or Persecution?

Proponents like Luckey claim these systems will reduce casualties, deter wars, and protect U.S. troops. And sure, fewer Americans coming home in flag-draped coffins sounds great. But what about Americans sitting on their porches, living in freedom?

AI weapons promise surgical strikes. But whose finger is on the kill switch? Whose morals are baked into the code?

SEE ALSO: The PX-5.7 Pistol from SDS Arms

If AI systems can identify a threat, who defines what a threat looks like? A foreign invader? A school shooter? A guy at a protest with a holstered pistol and a Gadsden flag patch?

From 2A to 404 Not Found

This tech isn’t just a battlefield issue. It’s a philosophical one. Because if drone policing becomes the norm—and make no mistake, that’s where we’re headed—then the balance of power tips hard in favor of the state.

And that’s where things get Orwellian.

When your home-defense rifle can’t compete with a flying death robot programmed by Silicon Valley, the idea of personal freedom gets murky fast. It’s hard to exercise your rights when you’re being scanned, tracked, and maybe even neutralized before you know you’re a “problem.”

So Where Does That Leave Us?

Are we witnessing the end of gun ownership as a meaningful check on government power? Or are we just entering a new phase where the battleground shifts—from steel and brass to bytes and bandwidth?

The Founders never envisioned drone swarms or autonomous weapons. But they did envision tyranny.

And if we don’t ask the hard questions now—about transparency, about who’s in charge, about what this tech means for the average gun owner—then it won’t be long before we’re not asking anything at all.

Because the machines will be doing the talking.

Stay armed. Stay skeptical. Stay human.

*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***