The Smith and Wesson J-Frame has long been the standard for a concealed carry revolver. Since the 1950s, police officers and armed civilians have carried the small 5 -shot revolver to protect themselves and the ones they love. Lipseys partnered with Smith and Wesson to create an enhanced J-Frame model in the centennial (internal hammer) line. This brought the revolver back into the state of the art with their 642 UC.
Intro
To be clear…I am a revolver fan. I started out with my first revolver in 1991 when I bought one of the newly introduced 640 centennial revolvers to carry as an off-duty and backup weapon as a newly hired police officer in Southern California. I carried that gun everywhere off duty, and on an ankle for years in uniform. These 5-shot revolvers have been a mainstay for me over the years when I needed a small, discrete, and easy-to-carry defensive firearm. Over the years, I’ve acquired a few of the J-Frame revolvers since my first 640.
The J-Frame
The J-frame was synonymous with most detectives in the 1980s. However, once the wonder nine pistols hit (and then the “micro 9’s” after…), many thought the era of the J-frame revolver was over. They were dead wrong. Moreover, S&W continues to invest in the J-Frame with many, many options available. Once I retired, I bought and carried a S&W 442 for quite a while. Even today, many officers still carry these as backup weapons, and armed civilians choose them for discreet carry.
I prefer revolvers for carry in many situations. First off, due to its size and irregular shape, the models like the S&W Airweight frame of the 442, the J-Frame is the gun I carry when I need a discreet carry option. As a retired LEO, my carry is much more geared towards self-defense over intervening in a crime. Therefore, the J-Frame has ample firepower with 5 potent rounds of .38 +P on board.
The longer and heavier trigger pull adds an element of safety. It can shoot reliably in those less-than-optimal shooting positions. For instance, from a coat pocket, with a less-than-perfect grip, and can’t be pushed out of battery in a contact shot. If I get a misfire when I pull the trigger, I just keep pulling the trigger to go to the next round. Finally, in the deep-blue state I live in, a five-shot revolver raises fewer eyebrows than a semiauto. (A sad but true reality here.)
Best Use of J-Frames
That all being said, the J-Frame is not for everyone, and is best for those who have some experience as a shooter when using it for defensive carry. It’s not a gun I carry into a high-threat area unless as a backup. Reloading is slow to say the least, and many have only rudimentary sights, which makes accuracy a challenge. These are truly up-close guns, or as some call them, “get off me” guns. Finally, recoil can be punishing in a lightweight J-Frame. If these are not obstacles to you, then the J-Frame can be a great option that can do some things a semi-auto can’t.
The Ultimate Carry Series
Recognizing that there were some areas where current J-Frame models could be improved to bring them to the next level, Lipseys partnered with S&W to create the Ultimate Carry series. This is what I can only describe as an enhanced J-Frame for today’s concealed carrier. So far, four models have been launched. Two are in .38 Special +P, and two are the 6-shot version in .32 H&R Magnum. (I understand more models on the way, incorporating titanium cylinders.) They come in the 600 series (642 UC and 632 UC for stainless) and 400 series (442 UC and 432 UC for blued).
I saw this and waited for it to be available here in California. Once they were approved for sale here, I ordered my first Ultimate Carry Revolver. Being as I have a fair amount of .38 Special ammo and can reload for it, I opted for the 642 UC. For carry, I use the Gold Dot 135 gr .38 +P short barrel round, which I carry in other revolvers is a proven performer.
Opening the 642 UC Box
So, first off, this is a stock model ordered from my local gun store…Smith doesn’t know me, and this gun wasn’t hand-picked for a review. So, what I saw when I opened the box was as unbiased/uninfluenced as possible.
The box itself is a slight departure from other Smith and Wesson boxes. My 442 and 686 I bought last year, came in the traditional blue plastic cases most Smith revolvers do. The 642 UC came in a blue and white cardboard box, reminiscent of the old-style boxes in the 1980s and 1990s. The revolver is packed in its blue plastic protective sleeve with the usual gun lock and manual included. Readers will be relieved to hear there were no keys for the dreaded internal lock…because it doesn’t have one.
642 UC Fit and Finish
The matte finish of the aluminum frame and stainless cylinder are nicely accented by black accents on the ejector rod, cylinder latch, trigger, and the sights. This contrast makes the appearance stand out. Fit and finish were great, with only the slightest gap between the cylinder crane and the frame of the gun. This has proven to be a merely cosmetic issue, with zero impact on the function or reliability of the gun.
What Separates the Ultimate Carry Series
The 442 and 642 are well-known lightweight revolvers that have been out since the early 1990s. So, how is the ultimate carry series different from these standard models? First off, the appearance of the gun is more akin to the early 342 scandium revolvers. The barrel is stainless steel with a matte aluminum colored shroud around it. The stainless steel cylinder blends right in. The cylinder chambers are chamfered to allow for quicker reloads, and the front of the cylinder is beveled for easier re-holstering. On top of the frame is the biggest difference you will notice – a set of real sights. A tritium XS front sight is pinned in, and a rear U-notch plain black rear sight is dovetailed into the top strap.
The 642 UC uses new VZ grips that are a boot-style grip with a much wider profile to better mitigate recoil over a larger area along the web of your hand, as well as to give a fuller feeling grip. (I have heard it suggested that this tries to mimic the trigger reach of a K Frame revolver, which many consider to be the gold standard for trigger reach. This enables a better trigger finger reach, and Lipsey’s says the trigger geometry was improved for a better trigger press. For longevity, they used titanium pins frame for the revolver’s internal moving parts. Weight is listed as 16.3 ounces for this little guy.
This gun also comes in a 6-shot 32 H&R Magnum version. This gives you 20% more rounds, and in an easily controllable and potent package. These will shoot 32 Long, 32 Short, and 32 H&R Magnum for ammo versatility. And yes, I really want one. I’ll see what happens…
At The Range
The 642 UC is regulated/calibrated per Lipsey’s for the Speer Gold Dot 135 gr. +P load and 148 wadcutters at 15 yards. I had both, and decided to test this out.
On my first range trip, I found the Gold Dot printed significantly high (between 1”-2”) at 5 yards and about 8” at 15 yards. My 148 gr wadcutters were much closer to the point of aim but still high.
The new sights were the star in this show. The tritium is bright, and the green fiber optic ring around it pops in even low light. No more struggling to see the rear edges of the gutter like on all my other J-Frames, this Ultimate Carry’s amazing rear U-notch sight makes for a clean sight picture.
Recoil
Recoil was stout with Gold Dot, but not outrageous. I did feel it in my palm, and the grips felt a little too thick for me. (I know…sacrilege…). The wadcutters were not nearly as punchy. Overall recoil was manageable for such a tiny gun.
Grips
I replaced the VZ grips with a set of Pachmayr Compac grips. It made a world of difference for me. This was because I generally prefer these rubber-style grips on my J-Frames. I hear Hamre Forge is making a grip for these guns that is both lightweight and well textured. It also adds similar geometry to the gun as the original VZs. According to S&W, these will be used on the lightweight titanium UC models.
The next shooting experience was worlds better. Once I stopped using a rest to get better groups and concentrated on my trigger press/sight picture, my results vastly improved. The Pachmayr stocks felt much better to me as well. First off, my wadcutters were matching up almost perfectly with the point of aim. I also tried Hornady American Gunner 125 gr (standard load) with the Gold Dots for defensive ammunition. The Gold Dots initially still ended up higher than I would like. However, after I got my trigger press down, I printed perfectly respectable groups right where I put the sights. The American Gunner also seemed to shoot to point of aim.
Trigger
The trigger press was slightly smoother than most J-Frames out of the gate, but not too light. I also found it was easy to stage the trigger. I came to what I can only describe as a plateau at the end of the trigger press, just before the break, where you could pause to verify your sights before that last little press. This, however, was when I had my only misfire. I don’t know if the pause in the press caused the hammer to not have enough momentum, or if it was a hard primer.
By the end of this test, I’m well north of 200 rounds downrange. No issues except for the one mentioned above.
Carrying the 642 UC
So I’ve been carrying the 642 UC for several weeks now, when my threat environment allows for it (which is most of the time…). The gun carries very well in my Harry’s Holsters Icon 2. The steel hooks of the DCC Monoblock clip keep it very secure, while the small claw brings the grip in, making the non-linear shape of a revolver conceal nicely in the appendix position. For a reload, I carry a Zeta-6 J-Pak, which holds a reload in an almost flat setup that disappears in a pocket.
Mine weighed in at 19.47 ounces loaded, a touch more than my 442, which is at 16.9 ounces. The additional material on the 642 UC, 5 Rounds of Gold Dot, and the Pachmayr grips might be the reason for this. Regardless, you really won’t notice the additional weight, especially when you consider the features you get in the snub nose revolver.
READ MORE HERE: Double-Action vs. Single-Action Revolver Guide
Overall Thoughts…Is this for You?
So is the Ultimate Carry revolver for you? The improved sights alone did it for me, along with the better trigger. However, I now caution new shooters to not get a snubbie like an Airweight J-Frame as their first gun. The longer/heavier trigger, recoil, and challenging sights can make this a gun for more established shooters. Why torture yourself until you get your basics mastered, or at least established?
If you are ready for a small revolver to carry when it’s the best tool for the job, then this J-Frame is more than worth a look. Sometimes we need a gun for places we don’t think we’ll need a gun, or where reliability is paramount. Smith and Wesson’s 642 Ultimate Carry gives you a lightweight revolver that conceals easily and has the enhancements we have all wanted for years. The sights, trigger, grips, and attention to detail geared to CCW set this revolver apart. If recoil is an issue, look at the 632 / 432. UC models. Get six shots of a caliber still able to address a threat. Smith has raised the bar on this one.
*** Buy and Sell on GunsAmerica! ***
Read the full article here
